Hot Coffee is a Rockstar mini sex game hidden within GTA San An. That's something I'm not trying to solicit, but it seems you certainly have it in your head to do so, from the postings you made rather then admitting my comments about modding as it stands in reality are correct as well. Trying to pick apart all of my posting is creating an air of inhospitality. The OP as in Original Poster needs his chance to expound on why and what he's posting, don't bother trying to defend your argument since I explained myself and there's simply no need to go on with this. How is grammatically correct even important? It's subjective, I type as I would speak (my thoughts) Not writing a book or college thesis. He is a user, a gamer, and he comes from the same school of knowledgeable coders who device game enhancements, so again, you can't argue he's not a modder, it's again an untruth! Edited Januby BlackListedB Patrick's work is labeled a MOD, though not to enhance gaming, it reverts the coding used to hide the minigame originally. Now if some user created the same title "mod", that's too bad, really, because you should never ride someone else's coat-tails, and use their mod work to gain notoriety for you own!! Don't bother trying to discount me further, I'm right, here, there's no false truth in what I said about Hot Coffee. I'm not talking about ANYTHING to come in years following those two discoveries, so that's that.
Patrick Wildenberg, excuse me if I got the spelling wrong at the moment, but PatrickW (his current online user name at GTAForums) is the programmer who unearthed and RESTORED Hot Coffee with his Mod, it made him somewhat infamous in the process, even he didn't want the controversy to include him in the swarm of press that came about, it effected everyone involved, right up to Dan and Sam Houser. This is wholly why I contest you arguing for legitimacy here.
Hot Coffee I'll also remind you, yet again, not an original user mod to GTA IV, it clearly existed BEFORE GTA 4, that's fact, it's truth, and there's no argument anyone, including you, can devise to say otherwise. Mod is short for Modification I'll remind you. Why focus on Rockstar over user mods? You seem to think I'm touching on things not related and off-topic. The truth is largely what I believe makes up the story of GTA and Rockstar within the book Jacked, it's only real critique was issues of the own Houser's device, that is to grant fewer and fewer interviews in recent years in which to quote from the horses' mouth so to speak. You feel that ego-less means you get the last word? I dunno about that, really!?!
I would beg you not to be daft, as the Brits put it, but I don't think that would do any good.
0 kommentar(er)
